Blog

The death of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the 20-year-old who attempted to assassinate former president Donald Trump in July 2024, sparked intense public and political reaction. His funeral, burial, or memorial service is often referenced in media coverage, especially amid controversies surrounding the handling of his body and the investigation. This article provides a clear, factual, and balanced look at what is publicly known about Crooks’ funeral and the discussions around it.

Who Was Thomas Matthew Crooks?

Early Life and Education

Thomas Matthew Crooks was born on September 20, 2003, and raised in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. He attended Bethel Park High School and later graduated from the Community College of Allegheny County in May 2024. Descriptions from classmates and neighbors portray him as quiet and socially isolated, with some recalling incidents of bullying during his school years.

The Assassination Attempt

On July 13, 2024, Crooks climbed onto a rooftop in Butler, Pennsylvania, during a Donald Trump rally, armed with a legally obtained AR-15-style rifle. He fired eight shots, grazing Trump’s ear, injuring bystanders, and fatally wounding one rallygoer, Corey Comperatore. Crooks was shot and killed by a Secret Service counter-sniper.

Controversies Around Crooks’ Remains

Before discussing the funeral, it’s important to understand the controversy surrounding Crooks’ body.

• Congressman Clay Higgins claimed that when he attempted to examine Crooks’ body on August 5, 2024, it had already been released and cremated without local officials—or even the county coroner—being informed.

• Reports suggested that the FBI authorized the body’s release just 10 days after the shooting, raising concerns about transparency.

• The FBI refuted these claims, stating that they followed “normal procedures” and coordinated with local authorities before releasing the remains to Crooks’ family.

Because of this dispute, much of the detailed information about Crooks’ funeral remains unclear or unconfirmed.

What Is Publicly Known About the Funeral

Limited or No Official Announcement

Major news outlets have not reported a confirmed date, location, or format for Crooks’ funeral or memorial service. Media mentions focus more on the controversy over his remains than on the funeral itself.

Family Response

There has been no widely circulated obituary or family-issued statement confirming a public funeral event. The Crooks family has kept a low profile following the shooting.

Impact of Controversy

The dispute over whether the body was released or cremated quickly has contributed to the lack of clarity about a funeral or memorial service.

Possible Funeral Scenarios

Private Family Service

The family may have chosen a private funeral, avoiding press attention and limiting attendance to close relatives and friends.

Cremation Followed by Memorial

If Crooks was cremated quickly, as alleged, the family may have held a small memorial service later, separate from a traditional burial.

No Formal Service

It is also possible that no formal service took place, especially given the controversy and intense media scrutiny.

Ethical and Practical Implications

Privacy vs. Public Interest

Crooks’ actions drew national attention, but the family’s choice to hold a private funeral would be understandable. Families often seek to grieve away from the spotlight.

Investigation and Transparency

The controversy highlights the importance of clear and transparent procedures for handling remains after high-profile incidents.

Media Responsibility

Reporting on funerals in sensitive cases requires balance—informing the public without intruding on private grief or spreading speculation.

Key Takeaways

• Public information on the Thomas Matthew Crooks funeral is extremely limited.

• The controversy over the handling of his remains has overshadowed details of any funeral or memorial service.

• The absence of an obituary or official family statement suggests any funeral was likely private.

• Families in highly publicized situations often prefer private or undisclosed ceremonies.

• Respect for privacy and clear communication from authorities are vital in such cases.

Conclusion

The story of Thomas Matthew Crooks involves not only a tragic and shocking event but also questions about investigation procedures, transparency, and the rights of families to mourn privately. While the details of his funeral remain unclear, the silence itself may reflect a deliberate choice to grieve away from public view.

Future reporting, if it emerges, should ideally come from confirmed family or official sources—allowing remembrance without fueling further controversy or speculation.